![Carles Sáez on Twitter: "@InertialObservr There's also the unfortunate fact that some older books make use of the 'relativistic mass', which depends on velocity, in order to make the formula E=mc^2 hold Carles Sáez on Twitter: "@InertialObservr There's also the unfortunate fact that some older books make use of the 'relativistic mass', which depends on velocity, in order to make the formula E=mc^2 hold](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EFxoaadUcAEz5T_.jpg)
Carles Sáez on Twitter: "@InertialObservr There's also the unfortunate fact that some older books make use of the 'relativistic mass', which depends on velocity, in order to make the formula E=mc^2 hold
![Easy Proof of E2=P2c2+(mo)2c4 | Energy Momentum relation | Einstein's mass energy relation - YouTube Easy Proof of E2=P2c2+(mo)2c4 | Energy Momentum relation | Einstein's mass energy relation - YouTube](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/8tgOQQ15k4M/maxresdefault.jpg)
Easy Proof of E2=P2c2+(mo)2c4 | Energy Momentum relation | Einstein's mass energy relation - YouTube
Science - Voy a tener que publicar cada semana pero no importa hoy voy a hablarles sobre la ecuación de Einstein. La mayoría de las personas conoce la ecuación de Einstein E=mc2
![special relativity - Is $E^2=(mc^2)^2+(pc)^2$ or is $E=mc^2$ the correct one? - Physics Stack Exchange special relativity - Is $E^2=(mc^2)^2+(pc)^2$ or is $E=mc^2$ the correct one? - Physics Stack Exchange](https://i.stack.imgur.com/PHbwj.png)
special relativity - Is $E^2=(mc^2)^2+(pc)^2$ or is $E=mc^2$ the correct one? - Physics Stack Exchange
![SOLVED: The Compton scattering between the incident photon and the quasi-free electron can be illustrated with the right figure: With the variables denoted in the figure, Incident photon apply the momentum and SOLVED: The Compton scattering between the incident photon and the quasi-free electron can be illustrated with the right figure: With the variables denoted in the figure, Incident photon apply the momentum and](https://cdn.numerade.com/ask_images/ac7d176a85874cd1a13ea796d0f38ff3.jpg)